Broaden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Deutcsh v. State · 439 So. 2d 762 - Watson v. State · 611 So. 2d 466 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The admissibility of statements by a coconspirator made outside the presence or hearing of the defendant represents an exception to the hearsay rule. `Where proof of a conspiracy exists, any act or statement by an accused's coconspirator in the commission of the crime, done or made before the commission of the crime, during the existence of the conspiracy and in the furtherance of a plan or design, is admissible against the accused.' Deutcsh v. State , 610 [So.2d 1212, 1222 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992)]."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duncan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.