Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

641 So. 2d 200

Burdick v. Burdick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-08-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1995

3 state decisions

Relies on Gatto v. Baron Properties, Inc. · Coggan v. Coggan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-08-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to reduce to final judgment an order awarding appellate attorney’s fees which was entered prior to the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. “It is axiomatic that a court has the power to enforce its orders, judgments and decrees by appropriate action.” Coggan v. Coggan, 183 So.2d 839, 841 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 820 (Fla.1966). The trial court also correctly ordered appellant to pay interest on the amount from July 10, 1989. § 55.-03(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Coggan v. Coggan, supra.

¶2AFFIRMED.

*201ALLEN, MICHAEL E., KAHN, CHARLES J., and MICKLE, STEPHAN P., Associate Judges, concur.
/641/so2d/200 · .json · Public domain