Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 33 - Stevens v. Jefferson · 630 So. 2d 1097 - City of Melbourne v. Puma · 356 So. 2d 315 - State v. Harris · 575 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Rodriguez · Dodi Publishing Co. v. Editorial America, SA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The information should include language to the effect that in the event the defendant is found guilty of the lesser included offense of petit theft, the defendant is also charged with felony petit theft under section 812.014(2)(d) by reason of the previous convictions of two or more thefts as thereafter described.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“even when there is a possibility that a conviction for a lesser included offense of petit theft would result in a felony petit theft conviction... the State must put the defendant on notice in the charging document.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.