641 So. 2d 414 - Marks v. Millman’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 92 So. 2d 629 - Wadlington v. Edwards · 394 So. 2d 1150 - Kirkland Masonry, Inc. v. Lorey · Arundel Debenture Corp. v. Leblond · First National Bank v. Savarese · 386 So. 2d 8 - Harnish v. Peele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is also generally recognized that a judgment creditor cannot have his debt satisfied out of property held by his judgment debtor under a resulting trust for another, no matter how completely his debtor has exercised apparent ownership over it, unless it is made to appear that it was on the faith of such ownership that the credit was given which resulted in the judgment sought to be satisfied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In the creation of a resulting trust it is essential that the parties actually intend to create the trust relationship but fail to execute documents or establish adequate evidence of the intent,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.