Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 641 SO2D 453 - Staman v. Lipman

Staman v. Lipman’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 509 So. 2d 1097 - Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage · Ivory v. State · 358 So. 2d 232 - Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Peralta · Kohly v. Royal Indemnity Co. · 189 So. 2d 239 - Ormond Beach First Nat. Bank v. JM MONTGOMERY ROOF. CO.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To obtain relief by certiorari, the petitioner must demonstrate that the order being challenged (1) constitutes a departure from the [essential] requirements of law, (2) will cause the petitioner material harm, and (3) cannot be adequately remedied by appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the discovery sought is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.