Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 641 So. 2d 50 - Palm Beach County v. Wright

641 So. 2d 50 - Palm Beach County v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2014

4 state decisions

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. · Kaiser Aetna v. United States · 563 So. 2d 622 - Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. · 640 So. 2d 54 - Tampa-Hillsborough Expressway v. AGWS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court has generally been unable to develop any “set formula” for determining when “justice and fairness” require that economic injuries caused by public action be compensated by the government, rather than remain disproportionately concentrated on a few persons. Rather, it has examined the “taking” question by engaging in essentially ad hoc, factual inquiries that have identified several factors-such as the economic impact of the regulation, its interference with reasonable investment backed expectations, and the character of the government action-that have particular significance. Therefore, we are convinced that the taking issue may only be determined upon an individualized basis because the various property owners’ interests will be different and will be affected by the thoroughfare map in a differing manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.