Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 641 SO2D 761 - Cummins Engine v. Invictus Motor Freight

Cummins Engine v. Invictus Motor Freight’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2013

4 state decisions

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aspinwall v. Gowens · 395 So. 2d 21 - McClendon v. City of Boaz · Wilson & Co. v. Sims · 55 Ala. App. 525 - Winston Industries, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co., Inc. · Georgia Cas. and Sur. Co. v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An amendment of a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when ". . . . (2) the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading...."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c) . . . is an objective standard and its application under the prescribed circumstances is nondiscretionary”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.