641 So. 2d 978 - Norris v. Guthrie’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 429 So. 2d 232 - Cuccia v. Cabrejo · Cuccia v. Cabrejo · Lee v. Missouri Pacific RR Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“| [.¡Likewise any negligent acts by an employee of [the convenience store] was not a contributing cause of [the plaintiffs] damages. Assuming that [the defendant] and not [the driver] actually purchased the beer at [the convenience store] and that the store cashier did not ask [the defendant] for proof of his age, this conceivable negligence was remote from and not a legal cause in fact of the fight. [The defendant] attacked [the victim] because he was angry and jealous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.