Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

641 S.W.2d 129

Ward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1982

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1982-08-17

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1996

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-08-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SNYDER, Judge.

¶1Movant appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts he did not fully understand the plea negotiations and therefore his guilty plea was involuntary.

¶2A thorough review of the transcript of the sentencing proceeding and the Rule 27.-26 hearing convinces this court the trial court’s judgment denying the motion was not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). An extended opinion would have no preceden-tial value.

¶3The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

REINHARD, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.
/641/sw2d/129 · .json · Public domain