Cammack v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · 58 Cal. 2d 469 - Britt v. Superior Court · Green v. State · Perales v. State · 3 Md. App. 90 - Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as private even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” [Citations omitted] 4”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Liebman v. State““(a) A person commits an offense if he knowingly engages in any of the following acts in a public place or, if not in a public place, he is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed by his act: * * * * * * (3) an act of sexual contact."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Liebman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.