Barnard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4126
Relies on Olney v. Cooch · Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co. · M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. Coleman · 79 N.J. Super. 249 - McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., Kearny · California Highway Commission v. Industrial Accident Commissionn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The existence of an employer-employee relationship is an issue of law.”); Barnard v. State, 642 A.2d 808, 813 (Del.Super.Ct. 1992)(”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Higgins v. Walls
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.