Robinson v. Ralston’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The Warden asks us to read into this Act which has as its ultimate purpose rehabilitation, a highly unusual sentencing option that would permit one judge to reevaluate another judge's YCA sentence and impose in its place a traditional adult sentence. There is 'not a word' in the statute or its legislative history 'about augmenting sentences or about having a second judge in any way change them.' [ Thompson v. Carlson ,] 624 F.2d 415 , 426 (3d Cir. 1980) (Adams, J., dissenting). Such a reading is contrary to the letter and the spirit of the act, and the cited provisions do not convince us otherwise.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Ralston v. Robinson

2. “The habeas corpus petition was granted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The Court found that the Bureau of Prisons' Program Statement 5215.2 providing that all YCA offenders with subsequent adult sentences be denied YCA placement was contrary to the Act and thereby invalid. We agree. The Act affords the offender with a judicial”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. King v. Kenney

3. “While I see, on this record, no indication to think that either Robinson or society will benefit by continuing the YCA treatment, Congress, by the statute applicable in this case, has mandated the continuance.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Ralston v. Robinson