Precision Striping, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.2d 1144 · 1981
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Santoni v. United States · Michel v. United States · Lombard v. Marcera · Weatherford v. Bursey · National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]union security clause operates to compel new employees to join the union, because union membership is the price for obtaining a job,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is well established that union membership is not always an accurate barometer of union support”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“represented a majority of the employees,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.