Parish v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.2d 188 · 1981
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Lingenfelter v. Astrue (2007), Cohen v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services (1992)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stark v. Weinberger · Henry v. Gardner · Ellerman v. Flemming · Futernick v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The phrase 'substantial gainful activity' implies employment with some degree of regularity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Multiple sclerosis is an incurable progressive disease subject to such periods of remission and exacerbation____ Because [the period when petitioner worked and attended school] was unquestionably a period of remission, we believe the AU erred in placing undue reliance on this brief and temporary interruption of plaintiffs progressively disabling condition. Rather, he should have considered that time-span as merely a period of remission in a continuing disability....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ttending college on a part-time basis is not the equivalent of being able to engage in substantial gainful activity. Seven or eight classroom hours are a lot less demanding than full-time remunerative work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.