Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 F.2d 553 - Rossi v. Brown

Rossi v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

642 F.2d 553 · 1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 1982
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 1 U.S.C. § 112B · 22 U.S.C. § 1392 · 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7151

Relies on United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. · Trudo v. United States · United States v. Belmont · Valentine v. United States ex rel. Neidecker · Altman Company v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless prohibited by treaty , no person shall be discriminated against by the Department of Defense or by any officer or employee thereof, in the employment of civilian personnel at any facility or installation operated by the Department of Defense in any foreign country because such person is a citizen of the United States or is a dependent of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “includes executive agreements concluded by the President with the host country, or whether the term is limited to those international agreements entered into by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant to Art. II, § 2, cl. 2, of the United States Constitution. This issue is solely one of statutory interpretation. 2 * In 1944, Congress authorized the President,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The purpose of [§ 106] is to correct a situation which exists at some foreign bases, primarily in Europe, where discrimination in favor of local nationals and against American dependents in employment has contributed to conditions of hardship for families of American enlisted men whose dependents are effectively prevented from obtaining employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.