Rossi v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.2d 553 · 1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 112B · 22 U.S.C. § 1392 · 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7151
Relies on United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. · Trudo v. United States · United States v. Belmont · Valentine v. United States ex rel. Neidecker · Altman Company v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless prohibited by treaty , no person shall be discriminated against by the Department of Defense or by any officer or employee thereof, in the employment of civilian personnel at any facility or installation operated by the Department of Defense in any foreign country because such person is a citizen of the United States or is a dependent of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weinberger v. Rossi“includes executive agreements concluded by the President with the host country, or whether the term is limited to those international agreements entered into by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant to Art. II, § 2, cl. 2, of the United States Constitution. This issue is solely one of statutory interpretation. 2 * In 1944, Congress authorized the President,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weinberger v. Rossi“The purpose of [§ 106] is to correct a situation which exists at some foreign bases, primarily in Europe, where discrimination in favor of local nationals and against American dependents in employment has contributed to conditions of hardship for families of American enlisted men whose dependents are effectively prevented from obtaining employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weinberger v. Rossi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.