Delaney v. Capone’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.2d 57 · 1981
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh · Adm Corporation, Appellee-Cross v. Speedmaster Packaging Corporation, Appellant-Cross Dennison Manufacturing Company v. Armando Mota and Frederick C. Osborne, Appellees-Cross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“each party to the suit is to bear its own costs,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Delaney v. Capone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.