Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 F.2d 699 - United States v. Murphy

United States v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

642 F.2d 699 · 1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 1997
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Brewster · Acosta v. United States · Helstoski v. Meanor · United States v. Myers · United States v. Dowdy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]vert act number 20 alleges that [defendants] met in Washington with another Congressman. That overt act, as alleged in the indictment, is not on its face protected by the Speech or Debate Clause, but if an offer of proof at trial indicates that it is protected when assessed in light of the other evidence, the [defendants] will be entitled to have that particular allegation stricken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.