Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 F.2d 793 - Brushwood v. Citizens Bank

Brushwood v. Citizens Bank’s Empirical Analysis

642 F.2d 793 · 1981

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
4
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably McBee National Bank of Texas v. West Texas Wholesale Supply Company (1983), Pearson v. Salina Coffee House, Inc. (1987)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

3601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Platt · In re Excel Stores, Inc. · Hammons Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Fedders Financial Corporation · Leichter v. Friedman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A financing statement substantially complying with the requirements of this section is effective even though it contains minor errors which are not seriously misleading.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(6) A financing statement sufficiently shows the name of the debtor if it gives the individual, partnership, or corporate name of the debtor, whether or not it adds other trade names or names of partners.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[under the majority decision] “potential creditors must undertake to discover trade names and to conduct additional searches in order to avoid a judicial determination that they lacked diligence. And even if they follow such precautions they might yet overlook one trade name and face potentially expensive litigation over whether they should have known about that trade name.” Id.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.