Allen v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.2d 799 · 1981
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Bloodsworth v. Heckler (1983), Hames v. Heckler (1983)
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on DePaepe v. Richardson · Baerga v. Richardson · Page v. Celebrezze · Johnson v. Harris · Gaultney v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he findings and decision of the Secretary are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405(g). The reviewing court thus has a very limited role, and may not decide the facts anew or substitute its judgment for that of the Secretary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arnold v. Heckler“The district court acted within its discretion in denying the motion to remand.”). 2 . Davis contends that the district court’s decision was not a substantive ruling. She is incorrect. The district court issued a substantive ruling when it ordered that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“administrative law judge may properly challenge the credibility of a claimant who asserts he is disabled by pain. In any event, the resolution of conflicting evidence is for the Secretary and the administrative law judge, rather than for this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arnold v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.