Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

642 F.2d 98

Docket No. 80-3350.

Guice v. Fortenberry

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1981.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1981-03-26

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1989

9 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Guice v. Fortenberry

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1George M. Strickler, Jr., N. Ann Wool-handler, Michael G. Collins, New Orleans, La., Samuel Thomas, Tallulah, La., for petitioners-appellants.

¶2James Caldwell, Dist. Atty., Tallulah, La., for respondent-appellee.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4(Opinion December 29, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 633 F.2d 699)

¶5Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, BROWN, COLEMAN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJO-FLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/642/f2d/98 · .json · Public domain