United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.3d 148 · 2011
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 472 · 18 U.S.C. § 514 (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Tomko · United States v. Levinson · United States v. Merced · United States v. Langford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If we find procedural error at any step, we will generally 'remand the case for re-sentencing, without going any further.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“correct computation of the Guidelines range”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.