Novick v. AXA Network, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[w]hen an action presents more than one claim for relief — whether as a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim — or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Ashmore v. CGI Group, Inc. · Roberts v. Bennaceur

2. “(1) [there must be] multiple claims or multiple parties ..., (2) at least one claim, or the rights and liabilities of at least one party, must be finally decided within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and (3) the district court must make “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay” and expressly direct the clerk to enter judgment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 977 F. Supp. 2d 343 - Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Fil Lines USA Inc.

3. “consider such factors as whether the claims under review are separable from the others remaining to be adjudicated and whether the nature of the claims already determined [are] such that no appellate court would have to decide the same issues more than once even if there were subsequent appeals.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Read v. Corning Inc.