Dillon v. Conway’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.3d 358 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Baggett v. Bullitt · House v. Bell · Holland v. Florida · Day v. McDonough · Alixcair Valverde v. James Stinson, Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Fac.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Instances which justify equitable tolling include a corrections officer’s intentional confiscation of a prisoner’s petition shortly before the filing deadline, a state appellate court’s failure to inform a prisoner that his leave to appeal was denied, and an attorney’s failure to file a habeas petition on behalf of a prisoner, despite explicit directions from the prisoner to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Franklin v. New York“operating] under an incorrect assumption that the AEDPA statute of limitations begins to run on the day after a petition is denied leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals.” 642 F.3d at 360 . The court attributed the incorrect assumption to a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“breached that promise when he failed to follow his client's instruction, with disastrous consequences that [the client] could neither have foreseen nor prevented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.