Gallop v. Cheney’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.3d 364 · 2011
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2333 (Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019) · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Neitzke v. Williams · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]o court can be said to have erred in failing to grant a request [to amend the complaint] that was not made.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to consider sanctions on parties who pursue patently frivolous appeals and force [us] to consider — and [the appellees] to defend — vexatious litigation, we may, with adequate notice and opportunity to be heard, impose sanctions nostra sponte.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[The] contention that the District Court abused its discretion in not permitting an amendment that was never requested is frivolous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.