Scheafnocker v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.3d 428 · 2011
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6331 · 26 U.S.C. § 6343 · 26 U.S.C. § 6511 · 26 U.S.C. § 6532 · 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 26 U.S.C. § 7426 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Mathews v. Eldridge · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Erickson v. Pardus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n the Taxpayer Advocate's denial of Scheafnocker’s original request for assistance, there was notice of her right to appeal to the District Court, along with a recitation of the statutes dictating the time-frame in which this appeal must be filed.”), vacated on other grounds, No. 08-2655, 2012 WL 1854183 (3d Cir. Apr. 24, 2012); Austin & Laurato, P.A. v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-1648-T-l7-AEP, 2012 WL 5907066 , at (M.D.Fla. Nov.26, 2012) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.