Hale v. King’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.3d 492 · 2011
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams · Howard v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that he has a qualifying disability; (2) that he is being denied the benefits of services, programs, or activities for which the public entity is responsible, or is otherwise discriminated against by the public entity; and (3) that such discrimination is by reason of his disability.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether Georgia prohibits a court from addressing the validity of Title II's abrogation of state sovereign immunity without first deciding that a claimant's allegations actually state a claim for relief under Title II.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arce v. La. State“[i]t is unclear whether, under Georgia , a court is required to determine if allegations state a claim for relief under Title II before proceeding to consider any other issue in the three-part analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arce v. La. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.