Chizzali v. Gindi’s Empirical Analysis
642 F.3d 865 · 2011
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · United States v. Dixon · United States v. Scott · International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[There is] one factor that can be disposi-tive in determining whether a party can successfully move for relief from the automatic stay under § 362(d)(1)— namely, the likelihood that the movant would prevail in the litigation if the stay were lifted. This factor appears in one commonly employed test for assessing motions to lift a stay under § 362(d)(1).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This holding dooms [the movant’s] argument under § 362(d)(1). The issue that [the movant] seeks to pursue in the Colorado Court of Appeals is the propriety of the state trial court’s order setting aside the entry of default against Bank of the West. We see little chance that the Colorado Court of Appeals would reverse that order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is no clear definition of what constitutes 'cause,' discretionary relief from the stay must be determined on a case by case basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Bridge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.