¶1 Tevin Rashad Wright challenges the sufficiency of the factual basis for his guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He contends that the Supreme Court’s decision in McFadden v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2298, 192 L.Ed.2d 260 (2015), calls into question our holding in United States v. Dancy, 861 F.2d 77, 81-82 (5th Cir.1988), that the offense does not require knowledge of a firearm’s interstate nexus. Because McFadden does not unequivocally direct this court to overrule Dancy, “we are not at liberty to overrule our settled precedent.” United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir.2013).
¶2 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. See United States v. Holy Land Found. for Relief and Development, 445 F.3d 771, 781 (5th Cir.2006). Its alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary.