Doe v. DiGenova’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 38 U.S.C. § 3301 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on United States v. Calandra · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Hines v. Davidowitz · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not such statute or regulation [is] valid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Stephens“is of such a nature that the Constitution permits only of one uniform national system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Stephens“complete as it is in every detail, was intended to provide the whole and exclusive”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Stephens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.