Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 NE2D 1371 - Faust v. State

Faust v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hensley v. State · Burris v. State · Beatty v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant and the victim, Kathy Bond, lived together. He was unemployed while the victim held two jobs. On midnight of October 23, 19.90, appellant returned home from an evening of drinking. Appellant awakened the sleeping victim and a heated argument ensued. When the victim began hitting appellant, he became angry, turned her on her stomach and sat on her. In his state ment to police, reciting the facts above, appellant did not mention strangling the victim. However, the pathologist who performed the autopsy on the victim said the cause of death was manual strangulation. Again, according to the appellant’s statement, when.he discovered the victim was dead he wrapped her in a sheet, tied both ends, took her to the basement of the building, and placed her body in a storage room. In the morning, the janitor went to the basement and noticed the victim’s body. In the meantime, the victim’s employer had made inquiry concerning her absence from work. Police Officer Shinneman responded to the dispatch and arrived at the apartment about the same time the janitor found the victim’s body. Appellant was taken to the police station where he first told police that he had spent the evening in Panda’s Tavern where he met a prostitute with whom he spent the night. However, when police informed him that Panda’s Tavern had been destroyed six months previously, appellant broke down and stated, “I didn’t mean to kill her.” He then gave a videotaped statement to police in which he detailed his co”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.