Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 NE2D 970 - Holmes v. State

Holmes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2014

12 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCollum v. State · Parrish v. State · Ferrell v. State · Bewley v. State · Erby v. Indiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be set aside unless it is manifestly unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled that a trial court may not treat an element of the offense as an aggravating factor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.