Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 SO2D 1092 - Parnell v. State

Parnell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 589 So. 2d 986 - Scalf v. Singletary · 640 So. 2d 77 - State v. Sullivan · State v. Moore · 527 So. 2d 941 - State v. Green · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rubber stamps may have some use for pretrial motions, but they are usually inappropriate for motions filed under rules 3.800 and 3.850.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “was ever rendered by filing with clerk's office); see also Parnell v. State, 642 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that trial court rubber-stamped on face of motion where record did not reveal that such”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.