Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

642 So. 2d 1094

Cameron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-07-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1995

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-07-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LAWRENCE, Judge,

¶1specially concurring.

¶2I concur in the result reached by the majority, only for the reason that I am bound by the doctrine of stare decisis. The facts of *1096this case clearly warrant a departure sentence. This able trial judge carefully maneuvered through the maze of acceptable departure reasons; he then selected what would ordinarily be a valid reason, only to be snared by Casteel.

¶3I further acknowledge that Shull requires a guidelines sentence on remand, and that the supreme court has thus far permitted no exception to that rule. However, in my view, the circumstances of this case would pose a good candidate for such an exception, permitting the trial judge a second chance to impose a just sentence.

/642/so2d/1094 · .json · Public domain