MacHt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 179 - Hill v. State · Grimes v. State · 619 So. 2d 340 - Harris v. State · Stanley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This transcript is not admitted and won't be admitted into evidence. The evidence is what's on the tape recording. If there's a conflict between what the transcript says and what you hear the tape says[,] the evidence is the tape, not the transcript and if you'reif you hear a conflict[,] what's on the tape is what the evidence is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“view an accurate transcript of an admitted tape recording as an aid in understanding the tape so long as the unadmitted transcript does not go back to the jury room or become a focal point of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.