Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

642 So. 2d 1193

Superville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-09-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2006

3 state decisions

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Harris v. United States · 339 So. 2d 1133 - Martinez v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-09-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MICKLE, Judge.

¶1The order of the trial court adjudging appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt is reversed upon the authority of Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965) and Pendley v. State, 392 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent -with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Upon remand, should appellant be convicted of indirect criminal contempt, the maximum penalty imposed without trial by jury shall not exceed six months’ imprisonment. Martinez v. State, 339 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), affirmed, 346 So.2d 68 (Fla.1977); Butler v. State, 330 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 863, 97 S.Ct. 168, 50 L.Ed.2d 142 (1976).

¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.
/642/so2d/1193 · .json · Public domain