Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 So. 2d 1318 - State v. Range

642 So. 2d 1318 - State v. Range’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Ybarra v. Illinois · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Clark v. Virginia · United States v. Reid

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “between the defendant and the house to be searched. The defendant's presence suggested an active role in the drug activities, rather than his just being someone unaware of illegal activities who just happened to be present when the warrant was executed. In addition, many suspected sales of contraband from the house were observed within twenty-four hours of the execution of the warrant. The court found that these factors provided probable cause to believe that the defendant was concealing drugs and that the probable cause was not based on”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.