Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 SO2D 1325 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2015

13 state decisions

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State · 49 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Melvin · State v. Almeda · 310 Pa. Super. 39 - Commonwealth v. Griffin · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`intentional' and `reckless' are inconsistent terms.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]ntent, being a state of mind, is rarely susceptible of direct proof, but ordinarily must be inferred from the acts and conduct of the party and the facts and circumstances attending them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “consists of three elements: (1) an intent to commit a particular crime; (2) a direct ineffectual act done toward its commission; and (3) the failure to consummate its commission.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.