Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

642 So. 2d 146

Gonsoulin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 16, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-09-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1999

1 state decisions

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 498 So. 2d 929 - State v. Wimberly

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COBB, Judge.

¶1The issue posed by this appeal is whether the crime of carrying a concealed weapon is a necessarily lesser included offense of the crime of carrying a concealed firearm. The trial court refused to so instruct the jury and the appellant contends that this was error per se.

¶2We agree with the trial judge based upon a Blockburger analysis1 of the two offenses. By statutory definition the term “weapon” as used in section 790.01(1), Florida Statutes, excludes a firearm; therefore, the elements of the lesser offense (carrying a concealed weapon) are not encompassed by proof of the greater offense (carrying a concealed firearm). Based on the statutory language, the two offenses are mutually exclusive. See State v. Wimberly, 498 So.2d 929 (Fla.1986).

¶3AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

¶4. Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932).

/642/so2d/146 · .json · Public domain