Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 So. 2d 35 - Fleckinger v. State

642 So. 2d 35 - Fleckinger v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · McKenna v. Nevada · 480 So. 2d 1284 - O'CONNELL v. State · 478 So. 2d 1281 - Neumeyer v. Terral · 301 So. 2d 762 - Slaughter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conclusively clear to the court after questioning, that there was no reasonable basis to anticipate that the juror could return a verdict against the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 869 So. 2d 725 - Howard v. State · 700 So. 2d 791 - Melendez v. State
  2. “counsel ... an opportunity to ascertain latent or concealed prejudgments by prospective jurors....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 700 So. 2d 791 - Melendez v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.