Curtis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am · 473 So. 2d 188 - Saik v. STATE EX REL. MISS. BUR. OF NARCOTICS · Ervin v. State Ex Rel. Miss. Bur. of Narc. · 586 So. 2d 756 - Threlkeld v. STATE EX REL. MISS. DEPT. OF WILDLIFE
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A concern of this Court has been that forfeiture statutes had the capacity `not only [of reaching] the property of criminals, but also ... that of innocent owners who did all they reasonably could to prevent the misuse of their property.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(2) The standard of proof placed upon the petitioner in regard to property forfeited under the provisions of this article shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“facts merely creating a suspicion that the owner had knowledge of the driver's illegal activity are inadequate to support a forfeiture.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.