Barclay v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2010
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 639 So. 2d 972 - Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Funding for Criminal Justice · 453 So. 2d 1102 - Downs v. State · 569 So. 2d 439 - State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist. · 595 So. 2d 8 - Breedlove v. Singletary · 597 So. 2d 262 - Kelley v. Dugger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Deficient performance is only the first part of the inquiry, even where petitioner can point to a deficiency in counsel's performance that deficiency will not warrant granting a Writ of Habeas Corpus if counsel's errors had no effect on the outcome of his case. Counsel's deficiencies in performance must be prejudicial to petitioner and petitioner must affirmatively demonstrate that prejudice. It is not enough that petitioner show that counsel's errors conceivably had some effect on the outcome of the proceeding, petitioner must show that, but for counsel's errors, a different result would have been reached."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. MacArthur v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.