Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 So. 2d 613 - Joseph v. State

642 So. 2d 613 - Joseph v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2015

6 state decisions

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Sherbert v. Verner · West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette · Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial justice should first have allowed petitioner to display the sincerity of his religious belief, and then should have applied the second prong of the Sherbert [v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 965 (1963)] test by balancing the petitioner's first amendment right with the interest of the court in maintaining decorum in its proceedings by regulating dress in the courtroom. [ Id. at 614.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Certiorari does lie, since the nature of the potential harm is irreparable. If wrongfully deprived of the right to wear his religious clothing in court, petitioner would suffer a harm which could not be remedied on appeal. Once the right were denied him, it would be lost forever. Petitioner would not be able to have the right adequately restored in an appeal from his conviction and sentence, if imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.