¶1This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. Appellant correctly contends the revocation order is deficient in that it does not set forth the specific conditions of probation that Appellant was found to have violated. Consequently, we affirm the order revoking probation, but remand the cause for amendment of the order to reflect the specific terms and conditions of probation violated. See Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
642 So. 2d 665
Hood v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 16, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-09-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1996
1 state decisions
Relies on Maddox v. State · Cue v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-09-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →