642 So. 2d 921 - Murray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 615 So. 2d 590 - Edwards v. State · 580 So. 2d 1302 - Hicks v. State · 580 So. 2d 1217 - Jackson v. State · Jowers v. State · 588 So. 2d 438 - Stringfield v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the Court has found the proof insufficient to support a charge of possession with intent to distribute, this Court has remanded the case for resentencing on the lesser included offense of possession.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[P]roof of possession with an intent to distribute or sell should not be based solely upon surmise or suspicion. There must be evidentiary facts which will rationally produce in the minds of jurors a certainty, a conviction beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant did in fact intend to distribute or sell the cocaine, not that he might have such intent. It must be evidence in which a reasonable jury can sink its teeth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.