Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 SO2D 999 - Hunt v. State

Hunt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Hall v. State (1999), 924 So. 2d 737 - Turner v. State (2003)

1 federal appellate · 63 state decisions

310199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1073 · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Kolender v. Lawson · Yick Wo v. Hopkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “against him on the part of the jurors; 2) when there is”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'Appellate courts review the legal sufficiency of indictments de novo.' Hunt v. State , 642 So.2d 999 , 1022 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993) (citing United States v. Schmidt , 947 F.2d 362 , 369 (9th Cir.1991) ). Further, '[a]n indictment”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`The determination of whether or not to grant a motion for change of venue is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial judge because he has the best opportunity to assess any prejudicial publicity against the defendant and any prejudicial feeling against the defendant in the community which would make it difficult for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial trial.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.