Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 642 SW2D 450 - McCravy v. State

McCravy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2018

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. State · Cody v. State · Morrison v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits an offense if, with specific intent to commit an offense, he does an act amounting to more than mere preparation that tends but fails to effect the commission of the offense intended.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[AJcts which “tend to intrude” [into a building or habitation] are not necessarily required. An accused could be convicted [of attempted burglary] as long as the alleged acts “tended to effect the commission of a burglary.” Thus, the emphasis is not necessarily on entry but on acts which tend to effect the commission of a burglary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “imaginary line which separates ... 'mere preparation’ from ... an act which ‘tends [but fails] to effect the commission of the offense,' ” because the appellant's action was the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.