Withers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[Prosecutor]: Now, your testimony is that the check register—that's what you call State's Exhibit G, correct? A: That is correct, the check register. Q: And it is your testimony that this document is accurate and State's Exhibit E is not; is that correct? A: That is correct. Q: Well, let's compare the two. I am going to start with page E53. Now, it says April 1990 at the top, does it not? A: Yes. Q: And that's in your handwriting, correct? A: All of it is in my handwriting. * * * * * * Q: Let's compare those to the next three entries in the pencil on State's Exhibit G. St. Luke's 575825, St. Luke's 56250, Ray Parker 231. So far State's Exhibit G, with the exception of the Denise Guieterez [sic], is tracking exactly State's Exhibit E, correct? A: It has the same entries. Q: And the next entries are Caramanna 11000, Stacy Rogas 150, Manden 11000. Do you agree those are the next entries on State's Exhibit E? [Rule 404(b) and relevancy objections overruled.] Q: The next three entries: Caramonna 110000, Stacy Rogan 150 and Manders 11000 [sic]. So again this document is tracking State's Exhibit E, correct? A: What you are reading is; yes. * * * * * * Q: The next three will refresh your recollection: Spiller $25, Linda Couteau, Glenda Seibert, $100. Still tracking State's Exhibit E, correct? A: Yes. Q: And Linda Couteau out to the side has birth code 385 and Glenda Seibert has birth code 386, correct? A: I can't read it without looking at the journal, the ledger. I would not know if”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thacker v. State