Salazar v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cumbie v. State · Hilliard v. State · Sellars v. State · 160 Tex. Crim. 579 - Hodges v. State · 35 Tex. Crim. 38 - Richards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) A person is nevertheless responsible for causing a result if the only difference between what actually occurred and what he desired, contemplated, or risked is that: (1) a different offense was committed, or (2) a different person or property was injured, harmed, or otherwise affected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rodriguez v. State“One intending to commit a felony and who in the act of preparing for or executing the same shall through mistake or accident do another act which, if voluntarily done, would be a felony, shall receive the punishment affixed to the felony actually committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Loredo v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.