Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 A.2d 1194 - In Re Denisewich

In Re Denisewich’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably In Re Sabetta (1995), State v. DiCicco (1998)

30 state decisions

200199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ullmann v. United States · United States v. Apfelbaum · Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · Handlon v. Town of Belleville · Lynch v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a statutory provision is unambiguous, there is no room for statutory construction and we must apply the statute as written.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.