Camp v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
643 F.2d 1325 · 1981
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2005 · most notably O'Leary v. Schweiker (1983), Johnson v. Heckler (1985)
22 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Celebrezze v. Bolas · Landess v. Weinberger · Brinker v. Weinberger · Emil C. Timmerman v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of H.E.W., Kenneth Marks v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of H.E.W.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]vidence as to claimant's impairments must be considered as a whole and cannot be fragmented so as to diminish their combined impact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.